Skip to Main Content

Scopus

Get started with Elsevier's Scopus: explore its key features, tips for effective searching, and how it compares to Web of Science for a smooth transition.

Comparison between Scopus and Web of Science

Feature Web of Science Scopus Google Scholar
Total Records 95+ million 90.6+ million 399+ million
Journals

 >22,619+ total            

(~7,500 are from ESCI)

27,950 active titles         

15,450 inactive titles

Unknown Number
PrePrints Yes - via Preprint Citation Index

Yes- arXiv, ChemRxiv, bioRxiv, medRxiv, 

SSRN, TechRxiv, Research Square

Unknown which Preprint servers are included 
Books 157,000+ 292,000; 1,167 book series Estimated 25+ million because integrated with Google Books
 Proceedings 10.5 million 11.7+ million conf papers Yes Unknown Number
Period Covered  1945-present; if Century of Science purchased, coverage goes back to1900 Records go back to 1788; cited refs for 1970 to present.  Unknown
Non-English publications Yes, if has an English abstract; 4% of the publications are non-English (excluding ESCI) Yes, if has an English abstract; 20% of publications are non-English Articles published in many languages
Update Frequency Daily Daily Unknow
Author Profiles Yes – algorithm generated Yes – algorithm generated Yes – author created
Citation Analysis Yes Yes No
Mark Records Yes Yes Yes-requires google account
Export Records  Yes - en masse limited to 1,000 records at a time Yes - en masse. Requires Login and limited to 20,000 records at a time Copy/Paste Only 
Strengths  Covers "journals of influence.” This has become synonymous with higher quality Exportable visualizations for author & citation reports Includes wide range of document types - e.g., theses and white papers
  Organization name unification Larger coverage of Social Sciences, Arts & Humanities than WoS Finds more citations than any other database in this table, regardless of subject area
  Ability to search & browse for incorrectly cited references & author name misspellings Includes trade publications Wider book coverage than other databases due to Google Books integration
Weaknesses Covers only "journals of influence" They are owned by a publisher and may not be neutral in their content inclusion Questionable content quality and many non-peer-reviewed sources
  Difficulty searching unusual author name formats: hyphenated, compound names, umlauts, etc.; and, ampersands in journal titles Errors in reference lists include: author names in wrong order, phantom citations added, transcription errors in author names and article titles Limited advanced searching features
    Cloned DOI's - identical number on multiple papers Difficult to narrow down common author name searches
      Need to create a GS profile to create reports

 

 

Table adapted from Iowa State University Library's "Scopus vs. Web of Science vs. Google Scholar vs Dimensions" Comparison Chart