You can use Scopus to generate various impact metrics and research analytics, which can be one aspect of assessing the performance or impact of your research.
There are some general rules for using metrics:
Use the same data source/metric when comparing works, as each metric uses different sources, and sometimes analyses to create the metric. This means that you should not compare a Scopus count for Article A to the Google Scholar count of Article B. Additionally, do not mix scores across different subject fields as citation behavior varies considerably.
You should try to use several different metrics, as each metric has its own strengths and weaknesses.
Include qualitative assessment in addition to numerical metrics. Context is as important as the raw numbers, for example, a high citation count could be due to positive or negative reasons.
One important resource:
CiteScore is Scopus' version of the Impact Factor. Scopus describes CiteScore as follows
"CiteScore is a family of eight indicators that offer complementary views to analyze the publication influence of serial titles of interest. Derived from the Scopus database, CiteScore metrics offer a more transparent, current, comprehensive and accurate indication of a serial’s impact. CiteScore metrics are available for 28,000+ active titles, including 15,000+ more than Journal Impact Factor.
CiteScore only includes peer-reviewed research: articles, reviews, conference papers, data papers and book chapters, covering 4 years of citations and publications. Historical data back to CiteScore 2011 have been recalculated and are displayed on Scopus."
In addition to CiteScore, Scopus also includes SNIP and SJR as additional journal level metrics. SJR, works similarly to Google PageRank algorithm which uses a "link analysis" approach, where the importance of a page is determined by the quantity and quality of other pages that link to it. With SJR citations from highly selective/prominent (e.g. Nature, JAMA) journals given more weight than citations from less selective journals.
SNIP, on the other hand, is a metric that attempts to account for field-specific differences in citation practices. Similar to author metric, Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) SNIP factors in the "citation potential" for each field to provide a standardized metrics intended to allow you to compare journals across disciplines. SNIP and FWCI can be particularly helpful for interdisciplinary researchers to demonstrate the impact of their works if the publish is disciplines with different citation rates.
Scopus does not have complete citation information for articles published prior to 1970.
Select authors to include in citation report:
FWCI (field-weighted citation impact) shows how often a publication is cited compared to the average for similar publications indexed in Scopus. Similar publications are determined by year, type, and discipline.
An FWCI of 1 indicates that the document has performed just as expected for the average. An FWCI of greater than 1 indicates that the document is more cited than expected according to the average.