Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
Ask A Librarian

Instructional Design and Technology : Evaluating Sources and Websites

Scholarly vs Popular Materials Guide

Website Evaluation Criteria

Use these guidelines when determining the reliability of a webpage for research.

1)    What type of site is it?  It’s helpful to know where the authors are coming from:

  • Popular (slick, 2nd or 3rd hand information; main purpose to entertain or promote a viewpoint
  • Substantive News or General Interest (general info, appealing to broad audience)
  • Scholarly (author is credible; bibliography present; language academic/technical)
  • Sensational (language is elementary, inflammatory, or sensational)

2)   Authority with regard to topicwho is responsible for the site?

  • Author of site (individual/institutional affiliation, organization)
  • Credentials, expertise, experience in subject matter
  • Contact information provided (name, e-mail, postal address)
  • URL type may suggest reputable affiliation or commercial interests (.edu=educational institution; .org=non-profit organization; .com=commercial enterprise; .net=Internet Service Provider; .gov=governmental body; .mil=military)
  • When in doubt about sponsorship, look up the site on

3)    Objectivitywhat is the purpose of the site? Does it push any particular viewpoint?

  • Check the statement of purpose/scope, and disclosure of sponsorship (look for “about us”), in addition to any “hidden” biases evident through your critical reading of text, or independent research done on the organization or author.
  • Who is the intended audience?
  • Information presented as factual or opinion, primary or secondary in origin?
  • Criteria given for inclusion of information?

4)   Accuracyhow accurate is the information?

  • Facts documented or well-researched
  • Facts compare to related print or other online sources
  • Links provided to quality Web resources

5)    Currencywhen was the information posted and/or written?

  • Evidence of current content
  • Pages date-stamped with latest update

6)   Usability—is the site well designed and stable?

  • Site organization logical and easy to maneuver with links back to home page
  • Content readable by intended audience
  • Information presented is error-free (spelling, punctuation)


Adapted from: “Criteria for Evaluating Web Resources”. Kent State University Libraries and “Introduction to Research–Evaluating resources”.  Cornell University Library