Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
Ask A Librarian

Understanding Copyright

This LibGuide is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Obtaining the right to copy

 

  • Although the person who creates a work holds the copyright, there are rights that can be exerted by others when they want to use or copy part of a copyrighted work.  Some of the exceptions that pertain to education and teaching are:

    • Section 107:  Fair Use - If the copying falls under one or more of the four fair use factors, it MIGHT be considered a fair use exemption.  This is a concept that is not black vs white and the validity of a fair use claim can only be settled in court
    • Section 108:  Reproduction by libraries and archives  - Libraries and archives (and their users) have exemptions to make copies of journal articles. small sections of books, etc.  - if the use is going to be held by that individual only, is research related, and is not for profit.
    • Section 109:  Effect of transfer of particular copy or phonorecord - Allows for owners of a copy (book, etc.) to transfer that copy by loan, sale, or just giving it away.  Also known as the First Sale Doctrine.
    • Section 110:  Exemption of certain performances and displays -  Among other things, allows for display/performance of some works when used in face-to-face instruction. 
  • Of course, if you want to use something that is copyrighted, you always have the option to ask for permission from the copyright holder.

Fair Use Factors

Fair Use is a set of exemptions provided within the copyright law, allowing others to use a copyrighted work without permission, if their use falls with in the exception's guidelines.

There are four factors that are considered for fair use exemptions.  However, not all four have to be met in order for the fair use argument to be used and just meeting one of the factors isn't necessarily considered conclusive.

Purpose:

  • the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;  was the use transformative?

​Nature:

  • the nature of the copyrighted work; is it creative or factual?  Fiction or research?

Amount:

  • the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole

Effect:

  • the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work


As an example, anything used when teaching a class is probably an educational use, which is one of the four factors.  However, that doesn't mean that a court would rule favorably in every single case that involved teaching; the other factors also play a part. 


The difficult aspect of fair use is that there is no hard and fast way to know if your use is a fair use; that can only be decided by litigation.  All four of these factors need to be considered when trying to decide if a use might be considered a fair use.  

Was the use transformative or a direct copy?  There is more leeway for a transformative use, such as a parody or mash up, than for a direct copy of a piece of work.  A good example of this is the Andy Warhol Campbell Soup can paintings; while they directly copied the cans, their transformation is what made the copy allowable.

Was the amount used reasonable or was it the entire work or the "essence" of the work?  Did the use have an effect on the market for the item?  Was the work used fiction or non-fiction?  Courts tend to look more favorably at allowing the exemption if the item was nonfiction.  For example, copying part of a newspaper story vs. using part of a novel.